damned for hubris on main
writing/aesthetics/fandom blog of grey || 27 || she/her ||
😖 destroyer of worlds 💣 🏳️‍🌈 frogs 🐸 blogging from the edge of the universe 🌽

tiktoksthataregood-ish:

roach-works:

wusdiswusdat:

creatures….. beasts even…… freaks perhaps….

op please know i love them so so much i kissing each one on the head

catchymemes:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

biglawbear:

thegaymertrainer:

That’s SO cool to see it explained

This is SO COOL. I’ve READ about this concept in comparing western and Indian music but this explains it well! They use “scales” differently!

Something else to note: western music uses half tones and is usually based around a “key”, but Indian music uses quarter tones and doesn’t use “keys” in the same way.

supreme-leader-stoat:

2urban2fantasy:

supreme-leader-stoat:

I’m afraid that I have the worldbuilder’s disease and it is terminal.

Fascinating. And where did this disease come from, how is it spread, and what demographics does it affect the most?

image

dumbass102:

madderhatter:

Sound ON

5weekdays:

this place has a brunch menu where everything’s named after this summer’s movies. so you got stuff like “indiana jones and the mango french toast of destiny” or my favorite:

image

the-haiku-bot:

peptothesi:

best-of-reblogs:

lionowlonao3:

lucyheartfiliaxxnatsudragneel:

not-a-recommended-url:

tinage-dreams:

furry-boss-monster:

home-stuck-in-desert-bluffs:

smore-692:

itscarororo:

haywood-you-stop-that:

icexxxtea:

pinkifingers:

rick-sanchez:

camiekahle:

THIS IS THE BEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN

I’VE BEEN TRYING TO FIND THIS FOR SEVEN YEARS

DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW HARD IT IS TO ?????

image

That last fatal scream tho

THE TERROR IN HIS SCREAM OH GOSH

image

i’m crying

WAAA-

I will always reblog this on the off chance some other poor soul has been searching for it

IT’S BACK

HOYL SHIT ITS B A CK

IT’S BACK?? ON MY DASH?

re-blogging again xD

what was that we were just saying about still having posts circulating from ridiculous numbers of years ago? 😂

image

I feel like it’s a duty to reblog such a natural treasure

I feel like it’s a

duty to reblog such a

natural treasure

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

theyouth–waste-it:

toastoat:

toastoat:

toastdurr:

sometimes i wish i had facial hair

like sexy stubble or something that would be so cool

image

perfect

image
image

im not coming back to tumblr i just needed to find this post in order to dunk on my younger self. you absolute baby buffoon. you dumbass

image

radley-writes:

thedreadvampy:

male gaze is not ‘when person look sexy’ or 'when misogynist make film’

death of the author is not 'miku wrote this’

I don’t think you have to read either essay to grasp the basic concepts

death of the author means that once a work is complete, what the author believes it to mean is irrelevant to critical analysis of what’s in the text. it means when analysing the meaning of a text you prioritise reader interpretation above author intention, and that an interpretation can hold valid meaning even if it’s utterly unintentional on the part of the person who created the thing. it doesn’t mean 'i can ignore that the person who made this is a bigot’ - it may in fact often mean 'this piece of art holds a lot of bigoted meanings that the author probably wasn’t intentionally trying to convey but did anyway, and it’s worth addressing that on its own terms regardless of whether the author recognises it’s there.’ it’s important to understand because most artists are not consciously and vocally aware of all the possible meanings of their art, and because art is communal and interpretive. and because what somebody thinks they mean, what you think somebody means, and what a text is saying to you are three entirely different things and it’s important to be able to tell the difference.

male gaze is a cinematographic theory on how films construct subjectivity (ie who you identify with and who you look at). it argues that film language assumes that the watcher is a (cis straight white hegemonically normative) man, and treats men as relatable subjects and women as unknowable objects - men as people with interior lives and women as things to be looked at or interacted with but not related to. this includes sexual objectification and voyeurism, but it doesn’t mean 'finding a lady sexy’ or 'looking with a sexual lens’, it means the ways in which visual languages strip women of interiority and encourage us to understand only men as relatable people. it’s important to understand this because not all related gaze theories are sexual in nature and if you can’t get a grip on male gaze beyond 'sexual imagery’, you’re really going to struggle with concepts of white or abled or cis subjectivities.

:whispers: also Death of the Author means you have to exercise self-criticism and recognise the bias YOU as the audience bring to interpreting a piece of work. Yes, your reading is valid. But to what extent are you extrapolating from your own experiences, privileges & lacks of privilege, past traumas, etc.? How might this affect your interpretation of the text?

More people need to understand that part, too.